Brazil’s JBS, the world’s largest meat processing company, contributed to human rights and environmental abuses in the country’s Amazon region last year by buying cattle that were illegally grazed on an indigenous reserve, as well as in two other protected rainforest areas, according to a new report by Amnesty International.
The report comes as Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro faces a tsunami of pressure from global investment firms (some of whom are threatening to divest); many of the world’s biggest transnational companies; the nations of the European Union; and even the country’s own past finance ministers — all who are vehemently urging the government to aggressively clamp down on Amazon deforestation which has soared under the current administration.
Titled “From Forest to Farmland,” the report details how JBS bought cattle illegally reared on the Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau Indigenous Reserve and the Rio Jacy-Paraná and Rio Ouro Preto extractive reserves, all in Rondônia state, the epicentre of last year’s Amazon fires, and a hotbed of Brazilian Amazon deforestation and violent land conflict.
All three of the reserves have long been targeted by violent logging and land grabbing gangs, with rural residents subject to intimidation, threats, forced displacement and even murder, with testimonies detailed in the report.
Satellite images featured in the report gathered in the first five months of 2020, and covering all three of the reserves, reveal areas recently cleared, with cattle and drinking ponds visible. Last September, in an operation by park rangers and Brazil’s armed forces, federal police arrested four perpetrators in connection with alleged land grabbing activity on the Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau Reserve and in the neighbouring Pacaás Novos National Park.
The operation followed a series of illegal invasions by loggers and land grabbers within the reserve that captured international headlines. Indigenous residents and advocacy groups asserted that the invasions were encouraged by Bolsonaro’s election and his inflammatory anti-indigenous rhetoric.
Also read: Statistic of The Decade: The Massive Deforestation of The Amazon
In April, indigenous teacher Ari Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau, known to patrol the territory as part of a forest guardian group and who had reportedly received death threats, was found dead near the edge of the reserve, killed with blows to the head, police confirmed to local media.
“The current government has a death policy, a genocidal policy that attacks the lives of indigenous peoples,” declared, Kanindé, an NGO that represents indigenous interests in Rondônia.
Cattle laundering scam
In the case of JBS purchasing cattle from the Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau Indigenous Reserve, the Amnesty International report alleges strong evidence of a process dubbed “cattle laundering,” where calves and young cattle are illegally reared on newly deforested conserved lands, and then later transferred to legal ranches lacking deforestation, before being sold to slaughterhouses.
Complicit meat processors habitually turn a blind eye to Brazilian cattle laundering, while past governments have set up regulations that facilitate the illicit process. Bolsonaro has gone a step further, attempting to make all such transactions secret.
According to the report, elaborated with help from Brazilian NGO Reporter Brazil, last year, JBS repeatedly bought livestock from a rancher who grazes cattle on three ranches — one located illegally inside the Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau Reserve, and two nearby but outside the reserve, one of which “legally” supplies JBS.
The company only ever acquired livestock directly from the legal supplier ranch. However, on several occasions, JBS bought from the legal ranch after the landowner transferred cattle from the illegal ranch inside the indigenous reserve, the report explained.
These transfers, as is typical in Brazil, were conducted utilising bookkeeping sleight of hand: In one example, the landowner registered two transfers of cattle to the “legal” supplier ranch — one from the other legal ranch outside the reserve, and the second from the illegal ranch inside the reserve.
Less than five minutes later, the landowner registered a cattle transfer from the supplier ranch to a JBS meatpacking plant with the matching number of animals, age range and sex to that just registered as transferred from the illegal ranch along with the legal ranch.
The report makes similar allegations of purchases from a supplier ranch that received cattle transferred from an illegal ranch on the Rio Jacy-Paraná reserve, then were transferred to the a JBS plant in quick succession.
On two other occasions, JBS bought cattle directly from an illegal ranch, registered in 2018, on the Rio Ouro Preto Sustainable Extractive Reserve — a protected area where 500 traditional people eke out a sustainable living collecting nuts and açaí, and growing coffee and manioc.
Also read: Indigenous People May Be the Amazon’s Last Hope
Richard Pearshouse, the report’s author, described the findings as certainly “the tip of the iceberg.”
“This company requires the effective monitoring of its supply chain, including its indirect suppliers, and [the meatpacker] should do that promptly… we believe by the end of 2020,” Pearshouse told Mongabay. The government too needs to do its part by establishing strong monitoring and enforcement.
JBS responds
In an email to Mongabay, a JBS spokesperson refuted allegations made in the Amnesty International report. “We do not purchase cattle from any farm involved in illegal grazing within protected areas. Any farm deemed non-compliant with our sustainable sourcing policies for any reason, including deforestation, is blocked from our supply chain,” the company said.
JBS added: “independent audits conducted over the past six years by leading auditors reveal 99.9% compliance with these standards overall. In 2019, 100% of direct purchases met our social-environmental criteria.” Though company officials admit that “The traceability of the entire beef supply chain is an industry-wide challenge and a complex task.”
“One of the main challenges for monitoring the entire cattle supply chain, including indirect suppliers is the unavailability of the information that allows tracking of all supply chain movements in Brazil,” said the company. However, critics have long pointed out that a simple tagging and digital tracing system — as already successfully implemented in Uruguay — would allow for an inexpensive and largely foolproof calving-to-slaughterhouse monitoring and accounting system.
Links to illegal Amazon deforestation have dogged JBS for over a decade. In 2009, the company signed separate non-deforestation agreements with Brazil’s Federal Prosecutors Office and NGO Greenpeace. But Greenpeace suspended its participation in March 2017 after JBS was fined more than BR$24.7 million (US$4.9 million) after buying nearly 50,000 cattle directly and indirectly from ranches embargoed by IBAMA, Brazil’s environmental agency.
Meanwhile, illegal cattle ranching in Rondônia has grown even more widespread since Bolsonaro was elected president, and since his ally Coronel Marcos Rocha became governor.
Also read: The Amazon Doesn’t Need Our Prayers, It Needs Accountability
According to state government data, obtained via freedom of information requests and used in the report, from November 2018 to April 2020, the number of cattle registered in protected areas rose from 125,560 to 153,566 head, a 22% increase.
The number of ranches documented to be within protected areas totaled 1,502 in April 2020, a 33% increase from November 2018. 89,406 head of cattle were transferred from these illegal ranches in 2019, an increase of 35% compared to the previous year, many likely going to legal supplier farms and eventually onto supermarket shelves.
At present, the Bolsonaro administration has expressed no interest in closing Brazil’s cattle laundering loophole — even though cattle ranching remains the single biggest driver of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.
This article was originally published on Mongabay.