Now Reading
Insurance Companies Cannot Discriminate Against Those With Genetic Disorders: Delhi HC

Insurance Companies Cannot Discriminate Against Those With Genetic Disorders: Delhi HC

The court held that the exclusionary clause of ‘genetic disorders’ in insurance policies is too broad, ambiguous and discriminatory.

Hospital
File photo: Doctors look at the ultrasound scan of a patient at Janakpuri Super Speciality Hospital in New Delhi, India. Credit: Reuters/Adnan Abidi

In a landmark judgment, the Delhi high court has held that discrimination in health insurance against individuals based on their genetic disposition or genetic heritage, in the absence of appropriate genetic testing and laying down of intelligible differential, is unconstitutional.

Justice Pratibha M. Singh has categorically held that the right to avail health insurance is an integral part of the right to healthcare and the right to health, as recognised in Article 21 of the constitution.

It also held that the exclusionary clause of ‘genetic disorders’ in the insurance policy is too broad, ambiguous and discriminatory – hence violative of Article 14 of the constitution of India.

The court observed that the exclusion of genetic disorders in all forms of health insurance would be contrary to public policy.
Several of the prevalent medical conditions which affect a large mass of population, including cardiac conditions, high blood pressure, diabetes in all forms, could be classified as genetic disorders.

The entire purpose of taking medical insurance would be defeated if all genetic disorders are excluded.

“The broad exclusion of “genetic disorders” is thus not merely a contractual issue between the insurance company and the insured but spills into the broader canvas of Right to Health. There appears to be an urgent need to frame a proper framework to prevent against genetic discrimination as also to protect collection, preservation and confidentiality of genetic data.

Insurance companies are free to structure their contracts based on reasonable and intelligible factors which should not be arbitrary and in any case cannot be “exclusionary”. Such contracts have to be based on empirical testing and data and cannot be simply on the basis of subjective or vague factors. It is for lawmakers to take the necessary steps in this regard”.

The court has also directed the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India to re-look at the exclusionary clauses in insurance contracts and ensure that insurance companies do not reject claims on the basis of exclusions relating to genetic disorders.

This article was originally published on LiveLaw.

Scroll To Top