Now Reading
The Partial NFHS-5 Data Is Reason Enough for Serious Concern, Urgent Action

The Partial NFHS-5 Data Is Reason Enough for Serious Concern, Urgent Action

Children play as a woman crosses a railway fence at a slum area in New Delhi, July 2018. Photo: Reuters/Adnan Abidi.

Partial results from the National Family Health Survey Round 5 (NFHS-5) released last week draw attention to the crisis of malnutrition in the country. The factsheets that are available pertain to 17 states and five union territories, put together they roughly account for half of India’s population. Although there are no all-India figures yet, what the data so far indicate is a stagnation, if not deterioration, in most indicators related to nutrition status, especially of women and children.

There is an improvement in some indicators in some states, but on the whole in most states there is a worsening in indicators such as childhood stunting (13 out of 22 states see an increase), wasting (12 out of 22 states see an increase) and underweight (16 out of 22 states see an increase). In fact, Andhra Pradesh and Sikkim are the only two states that see an improvement in all three of these anthropometric outcomes that reflect chronic and acute malnutrition among children.  There is also an increase in the prevalence of anaemia among young children, adolescents, pregnant women, non-pregnant women and men in most of the states. Further, even overweight/obesity among men and women has gone up in most states.

While full data will give a better understanding, it cannot be denied that what we have so far is reason enough for serious concern as well as urgent action. In fact, given that the second phase of the NFHS-5 has been carried out after the pandemic and the lockdown, one can only expect that the situation may be even worse in the remaining states. Given the economic slowdown and stagnation in wages of the poor over the last few years, the NFHS-5 results are most likely a indication of the fact that people’s ability to access good quality nutrition has reduced.

This was also reflected in the results of the consumption expenditure survey of the NSO (of 2017-2018) which has been leaked in the media but junked by the government citing data quality issues. A recent paper by Jean Drèze and others also finds a worrying stagnation in infant mortality decline in large parts of India in 2017 and 2018, which they say could mean that economic slowdown has had an adverse effect on child health. In such a context, strengthening the food supplementation programmes of the government through schemes such as the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and the school meals was extremely important to arrest at least to some extent the negative impact such economic distress could have on child malnutrition. Unfortunately, what has been seen in the last few years is just the opposite.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched his government’s ‘flagship’ programme POSHAN Abhiyaan (or National Nutrition Mission) in 2018 with the ambitious goal of elimination malnourishment. Although a proper evaluation would require more data, it is clear that the POSHAN Abhiyaan has only managed to scratch the surface and that most structural issues remain neglected. Only 37% of funds released by the Government of India for POSHAN Abhiyaan from 2017 to 2019 had been spent by December 13, 2019.

What the POSHAN Abhiyaan has managed to do is to create a buzz around nutrition with an additional 36% of the finds being spent on behaviour change communication. Further, 36% of the total expenditure on POSHAN Abhiyaan so far has been on the ICT – Real Time Monitoring component, as revealed by data that the Accountability Initiative got in response to an RTI. Under this component, anganwadi workers can now enter data related to children’s growth and other indicators on smartphones and the data is available in real time for monitoring. Considering the heavy burden of record-keeping on anganwadi workers, this is supposed to reduce the time they have to spend on filling registers as well as enable them to provide better services as the software aids them with reminders, appropriate nutrition and health messages and so on.

While such use of technology could surely help improve service-delivery, they are not a replacement for either supportive supervision or community monitoring. Here, it must be mentioned that over 30% of supervisory positions in ICDS remain vacant. Further, the data collected are not even available in the public domain.

As a recent report in The Hindu suggested, there are a number of issues related to internet connectivity and the server has also been down for over three months, which means in this crucial time of the pandemic, the governments or other stakeholders are actually not able to take advantage of this system of real-time monitoring.

This period has also not seen any expansion in the ICDS, which is the main platform through which nutrition interventions are delivered. A number of gaps in the ICDS, including poor infrastructure, insufficient funds for and therefore poor quality of the supplementary nutrition programme (SNP), low pay to anganwadi workers and helpers, need for additional anganwadi workers, converting anganwadi centres into creches that can give more attention to children under three years of age and so on have all been raised by many, for a long time now.

However, as has been pointed out in The Wire, the budgetary allocations for ICDS and other nutrition schemes remain inadequate. Analysis by the Accountability Initiative shows that approved budgets for the SNP accounted for only 44% of the total funds required in 2019. Further, in 21 states and UTs, the number of children receiving SNP was less than half the number of estimated number of beneficiaries, with a rapid decline in the number of SNP beneficiaries between March 2017 and June 2019.

In a nutshell, the last five years on the one hand have seen growing food insecurity among poor households and on the other inadequate investments in programmes such as ICDS that contribute to better nutrition. While there has been some improvement in other determinants of malnutrition, with some progress being seen in the NFHS-5 factsheets. There is an increase in access to toilets, immunisation coverage has gone up and some indicators of women’s empowerment such as women receiving more than 10 years of education or having a bank account also show an improvement – the benefits of these seem to have been negated by the neglect of basic household food security and access to diverse diets.

The period between 2005-2006 to 2015-2016 saw some improvement in the nutrition outcomes in the country with the overall prevalence of stunting reducing from 48% (NFHS-3) to 38.4% (NFHS-4).  While this improvement was still slow, it meant a reversal from previous trends of stagnation. This was a period that saw increase in real wages as well as an expansion in social security schemes of the government. It is clear that what is needed is a combination of both inclusive growth as well as concerted direct action towards improving the determinants of nutrition for women and children. In the last five years, we have slipped up on both counts.

Dipa Sinha teaches at Ambedkar University, Delhi.

Scroll To Top