Representative image of doctor holding up lung X-ray. Photo: Reuters.
Each day brings more information of SARS-CoV-2, its infectivity, its lethality, pathogenies and treatment. One of the most striking revelations has been that patients put on ventilators do extremely badly. Just about every centre reports very high rates of death once a tube is put in a patient.
Some critical care doctors have stuck out their necks to explain that lung pathology in COVID-19 patients seems different from that of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Dr Gattinoni Luciano, a leading intensive care expert from Italy, has suggested that the lungs of most COVID -19 patients retain their mechanical capacity to function despite severe hypoxia1.
Clinicians in New York have begun to notice that patients with COVID-19 having low oxygen saturation continue to be lucid and clear. It is not uncommon to find a patient with an oxygen saturation as low as 50% speaking on the phone. The term “happy hypoxia” has been given to the condition, only for these patients to suddenly collapse. The initial paradigm of intubating patients as soon as oxygen saturation begins to drop is drawing sceptics. It is slowly being suspected that patients with COVID-19 have a unique lung disease, and not the classical ARDS.
Treating doctors have realised that somehow intubated patients fare badly, with mortality ranging from 30% to almost 100%. One explanation discussed among critical care doctors is that air pushed in at high pressure by ventilators may be causing more harm to lungs than providing relief to them. Some doctors have noticed, serendipitously, that a patient with severe hypoxia but who are conscious did better with oxygen provided by a tube in the nostril.
Also read: COVID-19 Crisis: Ventilators Are Important – but They’re Not Perfect Either
One trick employed is to turn the patient to her left or right or even prone (on the tummy). There is dramatic improvement in oxygen saturation within minutes of applying this simple technique. The prime minister of England was likely treated with simple oxygen delivery. At the most he may have been given oxygen by continuous positive airway pressure2.
The COVID-19 lungs seem more like they’re suffering from high-altitude sickness. As one New York doctor explained, it is like dropping someone onto the peak of Mount Everest without any time to acclimatise. The SARS-CoV-2 virus, unlike conventional pneumonia, attacks both lungs. The patients come to hospital with low oxygen levels but not in distress. The usual patient is in acute distress once oxygen drops below 80%, but not the COVID-19 patient. The COVID-19 patient has a strange slime in her air sac that prevents oxygen exchange in the lungs. Increasing the force with which the ventilator can pump in air seems to be of little or no help.
Perhaps ventilators may work at lower pressures in selected patients, but this will need a randomised controlled trial to ascertain. For now, many critical care specialists are batting for simple oxygen administration to the patient, while she is kept in a prone position. No wonder that there has been a substantial reduction in the use of ventilators in COVID-19 patients in New York city. The current mantra is to use ventilators in select cases and to push in oxygen less aggressively.
The simple oxygen administration technique is buttressed by the first autopsy report from one of the top US hospitals, the Cleveland Clinic. The report consists of only two patients but is revealing all the same.
The first patient who died from the virus was an obese 77-year-old hypertensive man, whose autopsy showed that the lung sacs were smeared with a substance that resembled thick paint. The man was confirmed to be positive by RT-PCR. He had been symptomatic for six days, and had fever and chills. He died before he could be put on a ventilator. The lung sacs were inflamed and damaged, and full of lymphocytes – proof of damage due to virus.
The second case was a man who was infected by SARS-CoV-2 but did not die from it. The 42-year-old man died of bacterial pneumonia. He was admitted in critical condition for fever, cough and chills. A CT scan done before he died revealed ground glass opacities in both lungs. Nasopharyngeal swabs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 but lung swabs were negative. There were food particles in the lung and the bacteria could be grown on culture. The final autopsy listed COVID-19 as a condition but not the cause. The patient had died of bacterial pneumonia because of aspiration. The authors note, “Therefore, this patient likely died with COVID-19, not from COVID-19.”
Also read: The Curious Case of the Deaths That Weren’t Due to COVID-19
This autopsy report highlights the importance of the fact that a person can die from a condition removed from SARS-CoV-2 – i.e. the virus can be a bystander. Another person can die because of SARS-CoV-2. This distinction cannot be easily made by clinical judgment alone. Italian healthcare workers have already conceded that they are not sure how many perished because of COVID-19 and how many with it. The US Centres for Disease Control are also flexible regarding the cause of death in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. Confirmation of presence of SARS-CoV-2 is not mandatory when the death certificate is filed.